Where the strategy shows up in production.

Anything from a six-week POC to a multi-quarter platform rebuild. The common thread is that engineering is the primary output — not a side-effect of design. Typical shapes: a new commerce storefront, a mobile app rebuild, a headless migration, an AI workflow shipped into production, or a greenfield product MVP.

Yes, and we prefer it. Most of our engagements pair our engineers with yours — we handle the load during the build, your team takes the work forward after. We write the runbooks, pair on the deploys, and design the handover into the engagement so the system you end up with is one your people actually own.

Three criteria, in this order: durability (will this still be a reasonable choice in three years), hiring market (can your future self hire for it), and total cost of ownership. Boring technology by default. We do use the interesting stuff — but only where it earns its place against those three tests.

AI work ships with the same rigor as the rest of the system: evals before deploy, telemetry on day one, human-in-the-loop where the stakes warrant it, and a spend budget that lands in the same finance review as any other line item. We don't do "demos that impress." We ship workflows that make numbers move.

A tech lead, two to three senior engineers, a product designer, and a delivery lead — scaled up or down against scope. Every engineer on your build is senior. There are no junior hands on the system you're paying us to ship.

Everything: source, infrastructure, documentation, CI, the runbooks, the dashboards. No license fees, no retainer lock-in. We hand the repo over warm, pair with your team for two weeks, and stay on-call through the first real load event on the house.